Competition for housing makes renting more costly
It seems renting—particularly on single-family homes—is on the rise. And according to analysis from one industry player, that spells bad news for renters.
What goes up doesn’t always come down
Analysis from real estate marketplace Zillow shows high demand, low supply and virtually nonexistent construction starts are driving up rents on single-family properties.
“Rental houses have been in high demand since the housing market crashed, but a lack of supply has made renting those homes more expensive,” Zillow reported. “The median monthly rent for single-family homes is rising faster than the median monthly rent for apartments.
The median rent on single-family homes has risen 1.3 percent over the last year, clocking in at $1,404 per month. Median apartment rents rose just 0.5 percent for the same period.
Top cities for rent increases
Some markets, in particular, are seeing huge single-family rent growth. In Portland, Oregon, for example, rents on single-family homes have increased 4.5 percent over the year. But apartment rents in the city? Those are actually falling.
Other cities with notable jumps in single-family rent costs include Los Angeles (4 percent increase over the year); Atlanta (3.5 percent); Seattle (5.4 percent); Minneapolis (3.9 percent); San Diego (4.3 percent), Orlando (3.2 percent); Nashville (3 percent); Louisville, Kentucky (4.1 percent); Salt Lake City, Utah (5 percent: and Charlotte, North Carolina (3.1 percent).
The reason behind the staggering jump in rents is a combination of increasing demand, strapped supply and a lack of construction.
“There are fewer single-family homes to rent than a decade ago,” Zillow reported. “When the housing market crashed, investors scooped up many single-family homes lost to foreclosure and turned them into rentals. Almost 20 percent of all single-family homes across the U.S. were rented in 2016, up from 13.5 percent 10 years prior.”
This article originally appeared on TheMortgageReports.com